First cohort · 3 of 5 slots open · Q3 2026
Exposure, market, and competitive intelligence —
delivered as one recurring report.
Three layers in one report — your dark-web exposure, your market metrics, and how you stack against competitors — delivered weekly or monthly (PDF + executive email), built to land in a board deck, an underwriting model, or a strategy review. CISM-led methodology. Licensed data partners and public sources only.
The intelligence layers
Exposure, market, and competitive — quantified, not forty thousand alerts.
Exposure — How exposed you are.
rolls up to CXIMarket — How you're doing.
rolls up to MPICompetitive — How you stack up.
rolls up to MPITwo headline scores — CXI (exposure) and MPI (market position) — each with a published formula, source weighting, confidence intervals, and a versioned change log.
Read the full methodology →Who reads the Bureau's report
RPS, CES, and IMI translate posture into quantifiable exposure for renewal pricing, sub-limits, and binder decisions — comparable across insureds.
How it fits →Quarterly delta on the exposure layer — credential, IAB, ransomware, leak, impersonation — plus market and competitive context, with peer-cohort benchmarks for the board deck and audit-committee.
How it fits →One-shot exposure report on a target's externally-observable risk surface — evidence-grade attribution, methodology-versioned outputs, defensible in diligence.
How it fits →A white-label exposure report under your brand, priced per monitored domain — a quantified upsell for QBRs and renewals without building intel capability.
How it fits →Weekly or monthly PDF — 8–16 pages. Three layers — exposure, market, competitive — with the CXI and MPI headline scores, trend, top findings, peer-anonymous benchmark, and recommendations. Signed evidence bundle attached.
Same cadence as the report. Two-paragraph summary, the three movements that matter, links to the underlying evidence. Built to forward to a CFO or board chair as-is.
Webhook + email. P0: confirmed IAB listing or ransomware-crew naming. P1: 3σ spikes on any index — exposure or market. P2: new typosquats, competitor launches — daily digest.
Red lines
What the Bureau will not do. Print this. Show it to your legal team.
- ×No authentication bypass. No invite-only forums. No vouched-access communities.
- ×No buying stolen accounts or leaked data 'to validate.' We observe listings; we do not interact with sellers.
- ×No plaintext PII to clients. Hashes + metadata only. Dereferencing requires verified domain ownership and lawful basis.
- ×No cross-client data leakage. Peer benchmarks are aggregated and anonymized (N ≥ 5).
- ×No doxxing. No offensive OSINT. No HUMINT. No undercover personas.
- ×Zero tolerance for CSAM. Automated detection → immediate NCMEC report → zero retention.
The market has had bad experiences with vendors who promise "monitoring" and end up leaking or reselling the data they collect. The Bureau's red lines are contractual, not aspirational.
Frequently asked
The questions we hear in every first call.
01How are you different from Recorded Future, Flashpoint, or DarkOwl?+
Those vendors ship SOC-grade threat intel — priced $120k–$300k+/yr and shaped for SIEM-style consumption. We're a Bureau: one recurring report that combines your dark-web exposure, your market metrics, and competitive benchmarks into two quantified scores — CXI (exposure) and MPI (market position). CISM-led methodology, published formulas, peer-cohort benchmarks. Different shape, different buyer — built for the decision-maker, not the SOC.
02Why a recurring report instead of a live dashboard — or building this in-house?+
Because the buyer is a decision-maker, not a SOC analyst. A board, an underwriter, or a diligence lead needs a quantified, trended, defensible answer — not another console to staff and triage. A live dashboard optimizes for analysts who live in the tool; our report optimizes for the person who has to make a pricing, renewal, or go/no-go call and defend it. Building it in-house means standing up licensing, collection, methodology, and peer-benchmarking for a number you compute a handful of times a quarter. We amortize that across clients and publish the methodology, so you can trust the output without owning the pipeline.
03Is what you do actually legal? What about CFAA?+
Yes — by construction, not by promise. We collect only from licensed data partners and public, indexed sources. We never authenticate to a system we don't own, never bypass an access control, never join invite-only or vouched communities, and never buy or 'validate' stolen data by interacting with sellers. That keeps us clear of CFAA-style unauthorized-access exposure and the legal-grey collection that gets monitoring vendors in trouble. The source whitelist is contractual, and the red lines above are written into every engagement — show them to your legal team.
04What sources do you collect from? Can we audit the list?+
Source families are explicitly enumerated and contractual: licensed dark-web data partners (DarkOwl, SpyCloud, Constella, Flare), public stealer-log markets via archive mirrors, public ransomware leak sites, public paste sites and forum mirrors, certstream/WHOIS for domain monitoring, and public Telegram channels. The whitelist is contractual — additions or removals require a methodology version bump and 14-day client notice. Full list and per-source weights are on the methodology page.
05How do you handle our customer or subscriber identifiers?+
Identifiers are SHA-256 hashed with a 90-day rotating salt at the collector boundary, before they hit our storage. Only the hash plus breach metadata (source, observation time, severity flags) is persisted. Plaintext dereferencing requires verified domain ownership and a documented lawful basis (GDPR Art. 6(1)(f) + 34). Cross-tenant data never crosses a tenant boundary.
06How accurate are the scores? What about false positives?+
Three controls, all visible to you. (1) Multi-source corroboration: a signal confirmed in two or more independent sources scores higher than a single-source claim, and single-source signals are flagged as such. (2) Every index ships with an 80% confidence interval — we never publish a false-precision point estimate, and a thin or stale evidence base widens the band rather than hiding the uncertainty. (3) Time decay: stale signals lose weight on a category-specific half-life (stealer logs decay in ~30 days, old breach data over ~13 months). You see the confidence band, the top drivers, and the source count behind every number, so any score is auditable rather than a black box.
07How do you know the exposure is actually ours, and not background noise?+
Attribution is anchored to assets you verify you own — domains, brands, registered marks — not fuzzy name matches. A signal only counts toward your indices once it's matched against your verified asset set. Ambiguous or low-confidence matches are reported separately as candidates, never folded silently into the headline score, and cross-listing identity attribution carries its own confidence band. The result is a number you can defend, not an alarmist count inflated by lookalikes.
08What does onboarding look like?+
Day 1: tenant provisioned, source connectors lit, first scan running. Day 7: weekly index values stabilized. Day 14: first board PDF + first peer-cohort benchmark (assuming cohort is N ≥ 5). Day 30: first methodology review session. Typical first-actionable insight: 72 hours.
09Can we keep our existing takedown, registrar, or DFIR vendor?+
Yes — and you should. Our index outputs feed your existing operational stack: takedown queues, registrar dispute portals, IR retainer, GRC tooling. We don't replace those workflows; we make them measurably more effective by ranking the queue against quantified exposure.
10What does the legal team get? Chain of custody?+
Every index output is anchored to (a) the methodology version it was computed under, (b) the inputs at that timestamp, and (c) a SHA-256 hash of the evidence bundle. Signed evidence packages are exportable for litigation and regulatory submission. An independent auditor with read access can replay any historical value.
11How quickly do alerts fire?+
P0 (critical exposure event — e.g. confirmed IAB listing, ransomware-crew victim disclosure naming the client): inside 15 minutes of first signal. P1 (significant spikes ≥ 3σ on any index — exposure or market): inside 1 hour. P2 (typosquats, competitor launches, low-severity changes): daily digest at 09:00 in your timezone. Webhook + email + Slack/Teams. Sentinel/Fortress tiers include P0; Watchtower starts at P1.
12GDPR / CCPA — what's the posture?+
Minimization at ingest: identifiers SHA-256-hashed with a 90-day rotating salt. Documented lawful basis (GDPR Art. 6(1)(f) + 34). 13-month default retention, configurable per data category. CCPA / GDPR Art. 17 deletion endpoint is mandatory before any production tenant goes live. DPA template available; SOC 2 Type I in progress.
13What if we leave? Do we get our data?+
Yes. Full export — raw signals attributed to your tenant, all computed historical values, and the methodology version each value was computed under — within 7 business days of off-ramp request. JSON + CSV, no proprietary formats. No hostage data.
14What does the first cohort buy?+
Six-month commitment, preferential terms, direct input on the methodology v0.6 cut, quarterly roadmap review, founder Slack access. Three to five logos. Cohort closes when full.
Question not here? Send it with the cohort request note — we respond to methodology and contract questions in writing inside 48h.
First cohort · first 5 logos
Cohort terms: 6-month commitment, preferential terms, methodology input, quarterly roadmap review. Open to corporate security, risk, legal, underwriting, and corp-dev teams.