First cohort · 3 of 5 slots open · Q3 2026

Exposure, market, and competitive intelligence —
delivered as one recurring report.

Three layers in one report — your dark-web exposure, your market metrics, and how you stack against competitors — delivered weekly or monthly (PDF + executive email), built to land in a board deck, an underwriting model, or a strategy review. CISM-led methodology. Licensed data partners and public sources only.

3
intelligence layers
12
indices · enumerated
80%
CI bands · on every output
v0.6
methodology · audit-replayable

The intelligence layers

Exposure, market, and competitive — quantified, not forty thousand alerts.

Exposure How exposed you are.

rolls up to CXI
CES
CISO · Security
Credential Exposure Score
Credentials tied to the client's domains observed in licensed stealer-log feeds (RedLine, Lumma, Stealc, Vidar) and public breach combolists.
Force proactive credential resets by cohort. Cut account-takeover risk.
IMI
CISO · Risk
IAB Mention Index
Volume and severity of initial-access-broker listings referencing the client across public-source channels and licensed dark-web feeds.
Notify and harden the perimeter before brokered access is sold to a ransomware affiliate.
RPS
CISO · Cyber-insurance
Ransomware Proximity Score
Exposure to active ransomware crews — leak-site mentions, supplier-overlap with known victims, and cohort-relative incident clustering.
Quantify ransomware exposure for cyber-insurance pricing, vendor reviews, and board reporting.
BLV
Legal · Brand
Brand Leak Velocity
Rate at which proprietary brand assets, internal documents, and identifiable data appear across public leak channels and paste sites.
Prioritize takedown queues and legal escalation when leakage accelerates beyond baseline.
BIR
Legal · Marketing
Brand Impersonation Reach
Audience reach of typosquat domains, mirror sites, and impostor social profiles imitating the client — weighted by estimated traffic.
Direct defensive registrar spend, platform reporting, and takedown allocation.

Market How you're doing.

rolls up to MPI
WTI
CMO · Strategy
Web Traffic & Growth
Estimated visits, month-over-month growth, and engagement proxies from public traffic-rank and analytics sources.
Track demand and marketing ROI against baseline and the category.
SVI
Marketing · Growth
Search & SEO Visibility
Search interest and keyword-visibility trend drawn from public search-trend data.
Read demand direction and SEO posture before it shows up in revenue.
BZV
Marketing · Comms
Buzz Volume
Public mention volume across social platforms, forums, and industry press.
Measure attention and campaign lift, and catch incidents as they break.
SRS
Comms · Exec
Sentiment & Reputation
Sentiment and reputation trend across public mentions, scored over time.
Catch reputation shifts before they reach the board.

Competitive How you stack up.

rolls up to MPI
SOV
Strategy · CEO
Share of Voice
The brand's share of total conversation across a named competitor set.
See who is winning attention in the category, week over week.
CTB
Strategy · Corp Dev
Competitive Traffic Benchmark
Traffic rank and movers measured against the competitor set.
Spot growth gaps and where you're gaining or losing ground.
FLR
Product · Strategy
Feature & Launch Radar
Competitor launches, site and app changes, and press — detected from public sources.
React to competitor moves with lead time, not after the fact.

Two headline scores — CXI (exposure) and MPI (market position) — each with a published formula, source weighting, confidence intervals, and a versioned change log.

Read the full methodology →

Who reads the Bureau's report

Deliverable 1
Recurring report

Weekly or monthly PDF — 8–16 pages. Three layers — exposure, market, competitive — with the CXI and MPI headline scores, trend, top findings, peer-anonymous benchmark, and recommendations. Signed evidence bundle attached.

Deliverable 2
Executive email digest

Same cadence as the report. Two-paragraph summary, the three movements that matter, links to the underlying evidence. Built to forward to a CFO or board chair as-is.

Deliverable 3
Exposure-grade alerts

Webhook + email. P0: confirmed IAB listing or ransomware-crew naming. P1: 3σ spikes on any index — exposure or market. P2: new typosquats, competitor launches — daily digest.

Red lines

What the Bureau will not do. Print this. Show it to your legal team.

The market has had bad experiences with vendors who promise "monitoring" and end up leaking or reselling the data they collect. The Bureau's red lines are contractual, not aspirational.

Frequently asked

The questions we hear in every first call.

01How are you different from Recorded Future, Flashpoint, or DarkOwl?+

Those vendors ship SOC-grade threat intel — priced $120k–$300k+/yr and shaped for SIEM-style consumption. We're a Bureau: one recurring report that combines your dark-web exposure, your market metrics, and competitive benchmarks into two quantified scores — CXI (exposure) and MPI (market position). CISM-led methodology, published formulas, peer-cohort benchmarks. Different shape, different buyer — built for the decision-maker, not the SOC.

02Why a recurring report instead of a live dashboard — or building this in-house?+

Because the buyer is a decision-maker, not a SOC analyst. A board, an underwriter, or a diligence lead needs a quantified, trended, defensible answer — not another console to staff and triage. A live dashboard optimizes for analysts who live in the tool; our report optimizes for the person who has to make a pricing, renewal, or go/no-go call and defend it. Building it in-house means standing up licensing, collection, methodology, and peer-benchmarking for a number you compute a handful of times a quarter. We amortize that across clients and publish the methodology, so you can trust the output without owning the pipeline.

03Is what you do actually legal? What about CFAA?+

Yes — by construction, not by promise. We collect only from licensed data partners and public, indexed sources. We never authenticate to a system we don't own, never bypass an access control, never join invite-only or vouched communities, and never buy or 'validate' stolen data by interacting with sellers. That keeps us clear of CFAA-style unauthorized-access exposure and the legal-grey collection that gets monitoring vendors in trouble. The source whitelist is contractual, and the red lines above are written into every engagement — show them to your legal team.

04What sources do you collect from? Can we audit the list?+

Source families are explicitly enumerated and contractual: licensed dark-web data partners (DarkOwl, SpyCloud, Constella, Flare), public stealer-log markets via archive mirrors, public ransomware leak sites, public paste sites and forum mirrors, certstream/WHOIS for domain monitoring, and public Telegram channels. The whitelist is contractual — additions or removals require a methodology version bump and 14-day client notice. Full list and per-source weights are on the methodology page.

05How do you handle our customer or subscriber identifiers?+

Identifiers are SHA-256 hashed with a 90-day rotating salt at the collector boundary, before they hit our storage. Only the hash plus breach metadata (source, observation time, severity flags) is persisted. Plaintext dereferencing requires verified domain ownership and a documented lawful basis (GDPR Art. 6(1)(f) + 34). Cross-tenant data never crosses a tenant boundary.

06How accurate are the scores? What about false positives?+

Three controls, all visible to you. (1) Multi-source corroboration: a signal confirmed in two or more independent sources scores higher than a single-source claim, and single-source signals are flagged as such. (2) Every index ships with an 80% confidence interval — we never publish a false-precision point estimate, and a thin or stale evidence base widens the band rather than hiding the uncertainty. (3) Time decay: stale signals lose weight on a category-specific half-life (stealer logs decay in ~30 days, old breach data over ~13 months). You see the confidence band, the top drivers, and the source count behind every number, so any score is auditable rather than a black box.

07How do you know the exposure is actually ours, and not background noise?+

Attribution is anchored to assets you verify you own — domains, brands, registered marks — not fuzzy name matches. A signal only counts toward your indices once it's matched against your verified asset set. Ambiguous or low-confidence matches are reported separately as candidates, never folded silently into the headline score, and cross-listing identity attribution carries its own confidence band. The result is a number you can defend, not an alarmist count inflated by lookalikes.

08What does onboarding look like?+

Day 1: tenant provisioned, source connectors lit, first scan running. Day 7: weekly index values stabilized. Day 14: first board PDF + first peer-cohort benchmark (assuming cohort is N ≥ 5). Day 30: first methodology review session. Typical first-actionable insight: 72 hours.

09Can we keep our existing takedown, registrar, or DFIR vendor?+

Yes — and you should. Our index outputs feed your existing operational stack: takedown queues, registrar dispute portals, IR retainer, GRC tooling. We don't replace those workflows; we make them measurably more effective by ranking the queue against quantified exposure.

10What does the legal team get? Chain of custody?+

Every index output is anchored to (a) the methodology version it was computed under, (b) the inputs at that timestamp, and (c) a SHA-256 hash of the evidence bundle. Signed evidence packages are exportable for litigation and regulatory submission. An independent auditor with read access can replay any historical value.

11How quickly do alerts fire?+

P0 (critical exposure event — e.g. confirmed IAB listing, ransomware-crew victim disclosure naming the client): inside 15 minutes of first signal. P1 (significant spikes ≥ 3σ on any index — exposure or market): inside 1 hour. P2 (typosquats, competitor launches, low-severity changes): daily digest at 09:00 in your timezone. Webhook + email + Slack/Teams. Sentinel/Fortress tiers include P0; Watchtower starts at P1.

12GDPR / CCPA — what's the posture?+

Minimization at ingest: identifiers SHA-256-hashed with a 90-day rotating salt. Documented lawful basis (GDPR Art. 6(1)(f) + 34). 13-month default retention, configurable per data category. CCPA / GDPR Art. 17 deletion endpoint is mandatory before any production tenant goes live. DPA template available; SOC 2 Type I in progress.

13What if we leave? Do we get our data?+

Yes. Full export — raw signals attributed to your tenant, all computed historical values, and the methodology version each value was computed under — within 7 business days of off-ramp request. JSON + CSV, no proprietary formats. No hostage data.

14What does the first cohort buy?+

Six-month commitment, preferential terms, direct input on the methodology v0.6 cut, quarterly roadmap review, founder Slack access. Three to five logos. Cohort closes when full.

Question not here? Send it with the cohort request note — we respond to methodology and contract questions in writing inside 48h.

First cohort · first 5 logos

Cohort terms: 6-month commitment, preferential terms, methodology input, quarterly roadmap review. Open to corporate security, risk, legal, underwriting, and corp-dev teams.